The newest version of NSF’s Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) (NSF 22-1) went into effect on October 4, 2021. Included is a new requirement for overdue project reports. Chapter VII.D.5, Grant Closeout states if the grantee does not submit all required reports within one year of the period of performance end date, NSF must report the grantee’s material failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the award with the OMB-designated integrity and performance system (currently FAPIIS). NSF may also pursue other enforcement actions including the following:
In light of the new requirement, here is a brief refresher on NSF Project Reports:
If you need help with the submission of NSF project reports, additional information can be found on the research.gov site at Research.gov Help with Project Reports, or you can contact the CGA Cash Management Team with any questions at cashmanagement@cga.msu.edu.
by Mitch Meyle, CGA
Non-Resident Alien Professional Service Contracts (NRAPSCs) have seen a recent change in the way they are processed at MSU. To comply with MSU’s procurement policies, NRAPSCs over $25,000 should now be processed as requisitions/purchase orders.
However, because the university threshold for competitive bidding ($25,000; https://upl.msu.edu/mbp/mbp-270/index.html#bidding) is higher than the federal threshold ($10,000), CGA prepared the following guidance to assist units with compliance on federal and state sponsored program (RC) accounts.
- For federal/state sponsored awards
- NRAPSCs up to $10,000 – send the NRAPSC via email to CGA (audit.compliance@cga.msu.edu) for review and signature if allowable. Please note, if the total anticipated amount of the NRAPSC is budgeted for, or expected to be, over $10k for the project period, note 2 below would apply.
- NRAPSCs of $10,001 or more - to be compliant with 2 CFR 200, a requisition should be processed.
- Foundation/Other sponsored awards
- Up to $25,000 – send the NRAPSC via email to CGA (audit.compliance@cga.msu.edu) for review and signature if allowable. Please note, if the total anticipated amount of the NRAPSC is budgeted for, or expected to be, over $25k for the project period, note 2 below would apply.
- $25,001 or more – to be compliant with Section 270.7 of MSU’s Manual of Business Procedures (Competitive Solicitation), a requisition should be processed.
As outlined above, in many cases you would now process a NRAPSC in KFS just as you have been for a domestic PSC. CGA will be on the approval route log when appropriate and will still review for allowability on the specific sponsored account(s). Once the NRAPSC is established on a purchase order (PO), CGA would not be on the route log for review of specific expenses. However, those expenses are still subject to a post-audit review, which CGA does on a regular basis. If there are any questions with a specific expense once the PO is established, please feel free to reach out to the Audit and Compliance Group (audit.compliance@cga.msu.edu) and they can review the situation. Please review the expense processing FAQs on CGAs website for additional information (https://osp.msu.edu/PL/Portal/1515/ExpenseProcessingFAQs).
by Amanda Blank, OSP
Non-domestic influence in federally funded research has become a hot topic over the last few years. In December of 2020, the Government Accountability Office issued a report urging the need for enhancing the policies related to influence. Included in the report were the five federal agencies that fund the most research at universities: the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Science Foundation (NSF), Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Energy (DOE) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
In response, federal sponsors have updated their reporting requirements for personnel working on research projects. To assist faculty in navigating through all the new and updated sponsor requirements, SPA/OSP/CGA has created a Current and Pending/Other Support webpage, featuring the five agencies in the GAO report. Information you’ll find on this webpage includes:
- What needs to be reported;
- What does NOT need to be reported;
- When and how to report; and
- Links to sponsor resources such as FAQs, templates, and application guides
Do you have questions not addressed on this new webpage? If you have questions about completing Current and Pending or Other Support information at proposal or Just-in-Time stage, please contact your OSP Proposal Team; for questions on updating disclosures after award, please reach out to CGA Awards.
by Evonne Pedawi, CGA
The purpose of this section is to keep campus updated on sponsored program audits at MSU, as well as national trends in audit activity. Audits are an important part of sponsored programs as they provide an opportunity for sponsors to verify that MSU is complying with the award terms and conditions. As the point of conduct for external sponsored program audits, CGA has been very busy in the last six months!
Due to the COVID pandemic, we experienced fewer external audits in 2020. We are currently seeing sponsors try to catch up on lost audit opportunities, scheduling many virtual site visits and expense monitoring audits since Spring of 2021. Although sponsors have conducted audits virtually in the past, those have typically been audits with a smaller scope, such as an invoice audit. In this post-pandemic environment, it is a new trend to conduct audits with a large scope virtually and both sponsors and MSU are learning in this process. We have found that it is important in these audits to schedule face to face virtual meetings often to address the auditor’s questions and develop relationships. In addition, these audits have tended to be more time consuming as they are a more detailed review with a larger audit sample given that they are drawn out over a larger period of time as opposed to a focused 3-5 day on-site visit. We anticipate the trend of virtual audits to become the standard process.
The federal government’s funding in response to the COVID crisis has been an audit target that we believe will continue. A large portion of MSU’s Single Audit will be dedicated to HEERF and CRF funding received by MSU, and documented policies and procedures will be tested. In addition, we have experienced an increased interest by sponsors in MSU’s procurement methods and billing rates. This is a good reminder that even if the expense you incurred benefitted the project, if it did not comply with a required process, such as competitive solicitation, the sponsor may produce an audit finding and require MSU to return funds.
Please make sure to retain all information and communication related to your sponsored program and decisions made on spending in the event that a project you are or were involved in is audited during the project or after closeout (during the record retention period) Any questions can be sent to me at pedawi@cga.msu.edu or to Kristy Smith at smith@cga.msu.edu.
by Erin Schlicher, SPA
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training covers the core norms, principles, regulations, and rules governing the practice of research, and is intended to foster a climate of research integrity. It is required for investigators who receive funding from NIH, NSF, or USDA-NIFA, as well as for those conducting research involving animal or human subjects. Because the specific training requirements can vary by agency, SPA/OSP/CGA has developed an easy-to-use table listing requirements for NIH, NSF, and USDA-NIFA. The table includes responses to frequently asked questions, including:
- Who needs RCR Training?
- When should RCR training take place?
- What subjects must be included?
- How much training is required?
- How should RCR training be delivered?
Answers are shown side-by side for each of the three agencies, allowing for easy comparison. The table is provided as a resource for research administrators or investigators and can be printed to one page or bookmarked for easy reference.
by Julia Miszkiewicz, OSP
On July 1, 2021, the Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) launched a new Subaward Team responsible for processing all OSP-issued* subawards and subaward amendments. Previously, OSP subawards were drafted and negotiated by the Contract Team member who had reviewed the associated award.
The Subaward Team members are Chuck Roboski, Rhett Butler and Julia Miszkiewicz. Chuck collects and reviews documentation needed to issue the subaward or amendment. Rhett and Julia draft the subaward with appropriate terms and conditions and negotiate with the subrecipient.
The OSP Subaward Team’s goal is to issue the initial subaward draft within 10 business days from the date OSP receives complete and correct subaward information. Requests for OSP’s Subaward Team to issue new non-FDP subawards or amendments should be sent to subawards@osp.msu.edu. Please help facilitate the process by providing the following required documents/information:
FOR SUBAWARDS:
- Signed and completed Subrecipient Commitment Form
- Contact information for the subrecipient
- Statement of Work
- Budget
- Budget justification
- Any additional technical reporting requirements not listed in the Prime Award
FOR SUBAWARD AMENDMENTS:
- Clearly stated purpose of the amendment
- Revised statement of work, or supplemental statement of work, if applicable
- Revised budget and budget justification, or supplemental budget and budget justification, if applicable
- Any other subaward attachments that need to be amended
It’s helpful to include the SUBAWARD NUMBER OR PD/IP NUMBER in the subject line, e.g. “RC_______ - PU, PD 43771 Amendment 1 Request” or “PD 43771 Subaward Request with subrecipient____”.
Please contact the Subaward Team, subawards@osp.msu.edu, with any questions or concerns regarding the OSP-issued subawards and amendments. We look forward to working with the MSU campus community and collaborators!
* Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) Subawards and amendments issued by Contract and Grant Administration (CGA), will continue to be issued by CGA’s Awards Group.
by Karen Rich, OSP
Fellowships. They are an important part of doing research at MSU, yet they can be very confusing. How do you budget for them? How do you set them up? Should the fellow be the PI on the proposal, or should they have a different role? Are fellows employees? Who can apply for a fellowship? Indirect costs or institutional allowance? What even is an institutional allowance? Do fellowships cover travel expenses? Don’t let your confusion stress you out, there is help available! There is a section of the OSP website dedicated to de-mystifying fellowships. It has much of the information you need to prepare a fellowship proposal with confidence!
The OSP fellowship webpage answers all those questions and more. There are no spoilers here, you need to visit the website! It explains exactly what a fellowship is and includes agency-specific information for several sponsors. NASA, NIH, NSF, and USDA and several others all regularly fund research fellowships, but their application requirements can differ greatly. OSP’s fellowship webpage identifies this information and explains how to set it up in KC. (Especially important for system-to-system submissions!)
Please check it out before you prepare your next fellowship proposal. Please follow up with your proposal team contact if you need more help, but you should find much of the information you need in that one handy location.